Why
Invisible Faculty Favor Unions
by Gretchen Knapp, Instructional Assistant
Professor
(A version of this commentary originally appeared in the Pantagraph,
June, 2002)
I am an invisible
professor, and I am not alone. Over 40% of Illinois State
University's professors are invisible. We are temporary employees,
known as nontenure-track or adjunct professors. About half of us
work full-time, the other half work part-time. Although we teach
one-third of all classes, most people don't even know we exist.
Many temporary
faculty have the same education, credentials, and teaching
experience as our permanent colleagues, the tenured/tenure-track
professors. We teach many of the same courses. We are proud to
deliver the same quality of teaching.
Inside the classroom
students and parents can't tell us apart. Outside the classroom our
status as valued employees seems to disappear. Being invisible
affects our wallets, our job security, and our working conditions.
Despite advanced
degrees and years of experience, many full-time temporary faculty
earn less than a newly hired public schoolteacher. Beyond the
university setting, workers usually can expect to earn a minimum
wage or salary level. But ISU has not set a minimum pay rate for
part-time temporary faculty. No mechanism exists to reward the
experience, seniority, or exceptional performance of adjuncts.
Sometimes faculty
salaries actually decrease with experience. In one case, a
part-time professor who received multiple awards for excellence in
teaching was paid less when he taught the same course again one year
later.
Many temporary
faculty are hired or rehired shortly before the semester begins.
Some are hired yearly, while others are on a semester-by-semester
basis. Some of us have been "temporarily" employed over a decade.
We might not receive contracts until weeks after we've begun
working. The state routinely hires temporary and permanent
professors on annual (what does this mean?). No contract, no
paycheck. Sometimes we work for weeks on end without being paid.
Not all adjunct
professors have offices to meet with students in private and protect
student confidentiality. About 15% of us are so invisible that
we're not even listed in the university phone directory. Some
temporary faculty don't have office phones while others don't have
office mailboxes, university email, or access to office computers or
copiers. In today's technological world, some of us work for an
employer who diminishes our working conditions and needlessly
reduces interactions with our students.
Why don't we file a
complaint, you ask? Because we are truly invisible. Unlike the
rest of the University's employees, temporary faculty have no
recourse to a grievance policy or procedure. Our students have a
grievance policy, but we don't. We work for an employer who
refuses to establish formal means to resolve workplace problems.
Why, then, are we so
invisible although so many? Since 1996, our numbers have increased
almost 70% while the number of permanent faculty has remained
practically static. Increased reliance on hiring temporary
professors to replace tenured and tenure-track faculty erodes
tenure, threatens academic freedom, and reduces faculty authority.
Ideally, tenured and tenure-track faculty provide expert guidance in
specialized subjects to students, contribute to the world's store of
knowledge through research and publication, and serve the University
and surrounding community in various ways.
Temporary faculty
should not be expected to fill the triple roles of teaching,
research and service unless the University chooses to employ them
permanently with appropriate compensation. By and large, temporary
faculty do not have access to the resources and support available to
tenured and tenure-track faculty. Those resources enable the
science faculty to discover cures for diseases, the business faculty
to create new economic indicators, and education faculty to continue
improving public education. Universities serve students best when
employing permanent faculty who receive the resources and support
needed to fulfill their multiple roles.
The best uses of temporary faculty
are limited and specific. The National Education Association
endorses the use of adjuncts when an educational program requires
specialized training not available among full-time faculty, or when
a tenure-track faculty member has a temporary absence or leaves
without sufficient notice for the department to conduct a search to
fill her position. Others recommend that no more than 1 in 7
faculty should be adjunct at any given time, but at ISU, the number
is currently about 1 in 3. When employees are hired year after year
to fill the same instructional needs, then clearly the University
should create permanent positions to best serve our students.
Why, then, do
invisible faculty favor unions?
Like many
professional educators, we believe that a union is the sole means to
guarantee the rights we seek and the respect we deserve. We are
not alone. Our colleagues in Illinois and across the nation have
shown us how organized labor benefits temporary faculty and their
students. Adjuncts at Northern Illinois University, Eastern
Illinois University, Western Illinois University, and more recently,
Roosevelt University and Columbia College, are unionized. Through
collective bargaining our colleagues were able to negotiate
equitable salaries, better access to health benefits, standardized
workloads, and improved working conditions.
At ISU, we've waited patiently for decades
while administrators chaired committees and prepared studies that
brought about few substantive changes. Our long-term "temps" have
watched university presidents and provosts come and go. Whether the
University budget was rich or poor, the result has been the same:
temporary faculty are invisible. We ask to be treated with the
respect that university educators deserve. Our students deserve it,
and so do we. |